2009 BMW M3 vs. 1966 Jensen Interceptor
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jensen Interceptor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jensen Interceptor would be higher. At 7,205 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Jensen Interceptor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1966 Jensen Interceptor. (331 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Jensen Interceptor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jensen Interceptor (677 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1966 Jensen Interceptor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 1966 Jensen Interceptor | |
| Make | BMW | Jensen |
| Model | M3 | Interceptor |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 7205 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 677 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |
