2009 BMW M3 vs. 1972 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac Eldorado. (223 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Cadillac Eldorado (521 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1972 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1972 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | M3 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 8190 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 521 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 109.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 101 L |