2009 BMW M3 vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1980 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lotus Eclat. (217 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1980 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | M3 | Eclat |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 95.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.7 seconds | 8.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 67 L |