2009 BMW M3 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 365 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M3 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (401 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | M3 | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2160 mm |