2009 BMW M3 vs. 1982 Volvo 265
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 265. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 265 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (401 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 265. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1982 Volvo 265 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M3 | 265 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2660 mm |