2009 BMW M3 vs. 1986 Nissan Cedric

To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Cedric. (102 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M3 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1986 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Cedric. (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Cedric.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW M3 1986 Nissan Cedric
Make BMW Nissan
Model M3 Cedric
Year Released 2009 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3999 cc 1973 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 414 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 8300 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 167 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1810 kg 1275 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2740 mm