2009 BMW M3 vs. 1991 Honda Accord
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Honda Accord would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1991 Honda Accord. (176 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1991 Honda Accord.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Honda Accord. (230 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1991 Honda Accord | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | M3 | Accord |
Year Released | 2009 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2449 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2810 mm |