2009 BMW M3 vs. 1992 Rover 620i
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 620i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 620i would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1992 Rover 620i. (113 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 620i.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 620i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 620i. (172 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 620i.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1992 Rover 620i | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | M3 | 620i |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |