2009 BMW M3 vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | Midge |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |