2009 BMW M3 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
| Model | M3 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 69 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
