2009 BMW M3 vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (134 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (271 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | BMW | Rover |
| Model | M3 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 169 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2750 mm |
