2009 BMW M3 vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (220 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |