2009 BMW M3 vs. 1995 Rover 400
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 400 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 305 more horse power than 1995 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 400.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (401 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1995 Rover 400 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | M3 | 400 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2560 mm |