2009 BMW M3 vs. 1997 Ford Puma

To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Puma would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 325 more horse power than 1997 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Puma.

Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (126 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW M3 1997 Ford Puma
Make BMW Ford
Model M3 Puma
Year Released 2009 1997
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3999 cc 1388 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 414 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 8300 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 295 Nm 126 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 249 km/hour 180 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 42 L