2009 BMW M3 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (213 HP @ 2800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 920 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 7275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 575 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3510 mm |