2009 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3

To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 340 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 95 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.

Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW M3 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
Make BMW Chrysler
Model M3 ESX 3
Year Released 2009 2000
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3999 cc 1499 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 414 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 8300 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 332 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1525 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 3000 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]