2009 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2000 Jaguar F-Type. (390 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Jaguar F-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 270 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Jaguar F-Type has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jaguar F-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M3 | F-Type |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2390 mm |