2009 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP) has 208 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (206 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
| Model | M3 | Profile |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2880 mm |
