2009 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Vector RD 180. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Vector RD 180 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP) has 234 more horse power than 2000 Vector RD 180. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (401 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Vector RD 180. (175 Nm). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
Make | BMW | Vector |
Model | M3 | RD 180 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 88.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2390 mm |