2009 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (310 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Hac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3. 2000 Volkswagen Hac has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Volkswagen Hac will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2000 Volkswagen Hac | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | M3 | Hac |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1896 cc |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2520 mm |