2009 BMW M3 vs. 2001 Holden UTE

To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2001 Holden UTE. (302 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Holden UTE weights approximately 65 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden UTE (460 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2001 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW M3 2001 Holden UTE
Make BMW Holden
Model M3 UTE
Year Released 2009 2001
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3999 cc 5665 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 414 HP 302 HP
Engine RPM 8300 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 460 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1525 kg 1590 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2950 mm