2009 BMW M3 vs. 2001 Lotus Exige
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lotus Exige. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lotus Exige would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 2001 Lotus Exige. (177 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lotus Exige.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lotus Exige. (174 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lotus Exige.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2001 Lotus Exige | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | M3 | Exige |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 7.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 36 L |