2009 BMW M3 vs. 2001 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2001 Skoda Superb. (161 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Skoda Superb.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Superb, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Skoda Superb (350 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2001 Skoda Superb will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2001 Skoda Superb | |
Make | BMW | Skoda |
Model | M3 | Superb |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 62 L |