2009 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2002 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden UTE weights approximately 180 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden UTE. (306 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2002 Holden UTE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | UTE |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2950 mm |