2009 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Pagani Zonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Pagani Zonda would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 133 more horse power than 2009 BMW M3. (414 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Pagani Zonda (750 Nm) has 455 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm). This means 2002 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 2002 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | BMW | Pagani |
| Model | M3 | Zonda |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 547 HP |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 750 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 335 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2730 mm |
