2009 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2003 Mazda RX-8. (228 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M3 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2003 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda RX-8.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW M3 2003 Mazda RX-8
Make BMW Mazda
Model M3 RX-8
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3999 cc 1308 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 414 HP 228 HP
Engine RPM 8300 RPM 8200 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 211 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 12.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Top Speed 245 km/hour 235 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 4.6 seconds 6.7 seconds
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1525 kg 1425 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.9 L/100km 11.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]