2009 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Pagani Zonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Pagani Zonda would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2009 BMW M3. (414 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | BMW | Pagani |
Model | M3 | Zonda |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.7 seconds | 3.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2730 mm |