2009 BMW M3 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP) has 129 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (285 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 1012 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (441 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (400 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | M3 | Savana |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 5359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 285 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 117 L |