2009 BMW M3 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (295 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 1033 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (401 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | M3 | Savana |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 295 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 448 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2353 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 117 L |