2009 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (210 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Frontier.
Because 2004 Nissan Frontier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (318 Nm). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | M3 | Frontier |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 3278 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 318 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 73 L |