2009 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Westfield ZEI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Westfield ZEI would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 2004 Westfield ZEI. (174 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield ZEI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M3 weights approximately 650 kg more than 2004 Westfield ZEI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 2004 Westfield ZEI | |
| Make | BMW | Westfield |
| Model | M3 | ZEI |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2340 mm |
