2009 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (335 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 560 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (400 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M3 | 300 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 529 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |