2009 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (188 Nm @ 4150 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M3 | PT Cruiser |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 253 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 57 L |