2009 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (244 Nm). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 244 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |