2009 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | M3 | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 106 L |