2009 BMW M3 vs. 2006 BMW M6
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW M6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (507 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2009 BMW M3. (414 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 410 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3. 2006 BMW M6 has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 BMW M6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2006 BMW M6 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | M3 | M6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 507 HP |
Torque | 295 Nm | 705 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 12.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 14.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |