2009 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Chrysler 300

To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler 300.

Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW M3 2006 Chrysler 300
Make BMW Chrysler
Model M3 300
Year Released 2009 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3999 cc 3523 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 414 HP 250 HP
Engine RPM 8300 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 295 Nm 339 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 12.0:1 9.9:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 5010 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 11.9 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 17 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.9 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 72 L