2009 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2006 Jaguar XK. (294 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XK (411 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2006 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3. 2006 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2006 Jaguar XK | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M3 | XK |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 411 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 249 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |