2009 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP) has 214 more horse power than 2006 Mazda MPV. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | MPV |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |