2009 BMW M3 vs. 2006 MG ZR
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 MG ZR would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 255 more horse power than 2006 MG ZR. (159 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 MG ZR.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG ZR. (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2006 MG ZR | |
Make | BMW | MG |
Model | M3 | ZR |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |