2009 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Subaru Forester. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Subaru Forester would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP) has 251 more horse power than 2006 Subaru Forester. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Subaru Forester.
Because 2006 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Subaru Forester. (225 Nm). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2006 Subaru Forester | |
Make | BMW | Subaru |
Model | M3 | Forester |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 225 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |