2009 BMW M3 vs. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser weights approximately 15 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Because 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2008 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | M3 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 16.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.3 seconds | 10.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |