2009 BMW M3 vs. 2008 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Hyundai Matrix. (142 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2008 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | BMW | Hyundai |
Model | M3 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 295 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 166 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |