2009 BMW M3 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 326 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | M3 | Condor |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2436 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |