2009 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, both 2009 BMW M3 and 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 650 more horse power than 2009 BMW M3. (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 765 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | BMW | Koenigsegg |
Model | M3 | CCXR |
Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 1060 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 400 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.9 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 22 L/100km |