2009 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, both 2009 BMW M3 and 2009 Mazda 6 were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (146 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |