2009 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP) has 136 more horse power than 2010 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Calais.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | Calais |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 295 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |