2009 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2010 Mazda MPV is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 2010 Mazda MPV. (134 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda MPV weights approximately 185 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda MPV. (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2010 Mazda MPV | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | MPV |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 18.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 13.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |