2009 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (525 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2009 BMW M3. (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW M3.
Because 2011 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (530 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3. 2011 Audi R8 has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Audi R8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 2011 Audi R8 | |
| Make | BMW | Audi |
| Model | M3 | R8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 525 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1252 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 90 L |
