2009 BMW M3 vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW M3 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
Make | BMW | Fisker |
Model | M3 | Karma |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 36 L |